On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:09:55 Bob Ham wrote:
In a debug
version, it could be desirable, but for "production" use
(sorry for webspeak) it is unacceptable. It should be as fault-tolerant
as possible in those situations.
Yes, you're right, JACK should be as fault tolerant as possible :-)
I believe everyone on this list agrees on that. Would you have any ideas for
improving the current situation? I have the impression that JACK should be
able to produce a lot more debug on demand than it currently does; maybe this
could ease the bug hunting?
Juuso