2 Feb
2005
2 Feb
'05
7:42 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:49:42PM +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
For example, Rosegarden contains structure intended to
support things
like arbitrary layout engines for editing; multiple different layouts
on the same music data; event-based systems that are not MIDI, and so
on. Yet because it has taken so much development work just to do the
basic MIDI and audio support that people expect from a sequencer, and
because we are so few developers, most of this is still unused.
And unknown I suspect. If indeed the internals of Rosegarden offer so
much scope for new developments, they should make a good subject for a
presentation or even a workshop at LAC.
--
FA