19 Jan
2004
19 Jan
'04
8:59 p.m.
Steve Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:41:30 +0100, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
Yes, unless the front half and back half of the mixer are seperate jack
clients, but I dont think thats a good idea :)
Even making the front half and back half of the mixer into separate
clients can be
defeated by a sufficiently pathological user. (Eg by chaining all the
input sections
together in the "wrong" order).
Simon Jenkins
(Bristol, UK)
Oh dear...
C needs to be called between A and B, but even if JACK and the
two clients know that A->C->B is the correct order (which none of them do)
it can't be achieved because A and B must be processed in a single callback.
This will 'work', AFAICS, but with one cycle delay. This sets me thinking
about using JACK for insertion points in a mixer. This will always introduce
extra delays...