4 Jun
2007
4 Jun
'07
6:08 a.m.
======= On Monday 04 June 2007, Lars Luthman wrote: =======
...
It may be cheaper to downsample from 88.2 kHz - just
use a brickwall
filter and then throw away every odd sample. I don't think that's reason
enough for using it though, downsampling is presumably a one-time job
that isn't all that urgent.
--ll
======= On Monday 04 June 2007, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: =======
...
If you are using the secret rabbit code SINC based (or
any other
"correct" resampler) to do the resampling, then the only advantage
of 88k2 is that it uses slight less disk space.
When using crappy resamplers (ie linear resamplers, including the
one in secret rabbit code), they may be slightly less bad at doing
88k2 -> 44k1 than 96k -> 44k1.
HTH,
Erik
Lars, Erik, thanks!
I concluded, I can use 96K, SRC and forget about the issue.
Andrew