On Tuesday, December 29, 2009, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Pedro
Lopez-Cabanillas
<pedro.lopez.cabanillas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The ending in "mm" simply means to me
something related to C++. Qt uses
standard C++ in despite of FUD and propaganda that has been spread
everywhere by zealots.
zealots? i can't think of a single C++ related project whose name ends
in "mm" that is not in some what related to the work of murray cumming
and rest of the team that wrap GNOME in C++ bindings. am i missing
out?
I'm not willing to polemize with you, but my affirmation was very clear: Qt
uses standard C++ and the propaganda saying otherwise is FUD. I'm sorry if
you felt identified by the name "zealot".
On the other hand: the name I've given to my library is only my own bussines,
unless there is a clash with another piece of software with the same name. Is
there such thing?
It is not
likely to happen, but if somebody writes a wrapper around the
ALSA sequencer API using sigc, gobjects and other gnome friendly
frameworks, wouldn't be more appropriate to name it gaseq ?
sigc has nothing whatsoever to do with gnome.
gobjects have nothing whatsoever to do with any of the *mm wrappers,
fundamentally.
On Monday, December 28, 2009, torbenh wrote:
hmm... maybe its just me. but to me the name aseqmm
would imply it uses
sigc and gobjects.
wouldnt qaseq be amore appropriate name ?
I've copied the original comment, that I've answered and you apparently can't
read.
Let's stop fighting about terminology, and tell me what is the true origin of
your wraith against me.
Regards,
Pedro