18 Dec
2002
18 Dec
'02
2:23 p.m.
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 16.38, Steve Harris wrote:
In what way? Not expressive enough?
I have an aversion to expressing anything like this as an int, for
both artistic and technical reasons.
So do I. I may not be very trained in classic music and traditional
theory, but I'm quite serious about writing music, and do run into
various frustrating limitations every now and then. It's not like I'm
just *guessing* all the time, which seems to be what some think.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Tim Goetze
wrote:
Hmm... Yes, that's a good point. There's probably a reason why we're
on this list. :-)
i would love to have more musicians actively
participate in
this list but there seem to be few.
I would expect most people here are "musicians" to some degree.
It'd be a pretty wierd thing to obsess about otherwise ;) I think fp arithmetics have more effect or accuracy
than
traditional ways of thinking about meters - but I must be
wrong, then.
they are simply not adequate in this context.