24 Mar
2012
24 Mar
'12
4:19 p.m.
On 03/22/2012 04:10 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 11:55 +0100, rosea.grammostola
wrote:
Thanks David. More devs with an opinion? Fons, Torben, Paul, Emanual, ... ?
\r
Hi,
I wonder what the LAD community thinks about Non Session Manager
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui-gC_ZMeGM
http://youtu.be/xzspJXbEoc0
From a user POV I must say that it works very smooth at first sight.
I haven't actually tried it yet, but took a peek.
From the developer POV, the implementation of the daemon about 2000
lines of C or so, and it only depends on a standard protocol (OSC) with
several implementations.
I have no idea how well it works, or what I think of the details, but
that wins it major points in my book. It is an appropriate size for the
task at hand and doesn't ram dependencies down implementer's throats.
-dr