Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?

On 8 July 2011 02:04, Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabrbedd(a)gmail.com> wrote: I think that when I was coding BoxySeq, I did look at the JACK ringbuffer code and decided to simplify it for my purposes. I "fixed it" so there was no need for the byte count parameters for read/write, and removed some of the functions I decided I didn't need (ie peek, but then re-introduced my own versions). I found problems with my implementation but it basically worked 99% of the time so I came back to it the other day with the mistaken belief that atomic read/write pointer operations along with a reduction of variables used for each read/write operation would fix it. I was rather pleased actually with how much this strategy made the code *look* cleaner, so surely it would work! James.