4 Aug
2009
4 Aug
'09
10:16 a.m.
On 4 Aug 2009, at 10:21, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Frank
Barknecht<fbar(a)footils.org>
wrote:
I'm a but rusty on these issues, but my reading of the GPLv2 (many
years ago now) was that LADSPA plugins in it do not "infect" the host
with their licence.
There used to be a clear distinction between runtime linking, and
loadtime linking.
- Steve
Hallo,
Arnold Krille hat gesagt: // Arnold Krille wrote:
Arnold's explanation is approximately true of the LGPL rather than the
GPL, so perhaps that's the confusion here. The LADSPA header is
indeed under the LGPL, but the plugins in question are generally under
the GPL -- so terms and conditions of our normal flamefests apply. Please be aware that (last time I checked) the
gpl doesn't talk
about giving
access to all gpl-code you use. Only if you change something you
have to make
your changes available for free.
Huh? I think, you're confusing something here. Is it too early in
the morning?