26 Jul
2006
26 Jul
'06
9:24 a.m.
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 12:08 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 09:02:31 +1000, Erik de Castro
Lopo wrote:
Heh, I get that from UNIX people too though, I always assumed they were
trying to wind me up...
But it _would_ be nice to have template functors as callbacks in liblo,
so you wouldn't have to write static wrappers all the time. =)
--
Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
Mmm. For
what it's worth, I write mostly C++ but have no problem
with using the libsndfile C API.
Most people who really know C++ know enough to be comfortable
with pure C. I'm pretty sure you fall into this category.
However, I do get emails from some of the more clueless Windiots
complaining that libsndfile is written in old-fashioned C instead
of nice shiny modern C++. IMNSHO these people should not be allowed
anywhere near a language as complex, subtle, and unforgiving as
C++ (or for that matter as unforgiving as C).