On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, alex stone wrote:
user based options and give devs more meat to work
with. For all the
discussion about keeping the core api "pure", there seems to be an
equal number of discussions from devs who would like to see a greater
degree of functionality, but are stifled by the currently
enforced......taboo regarding anything to do with the API.
I don't think it's quite so dogmatic. The problem with most
of the wish-list items is that the discussions have mostly
remained discussions. For them to become real someone has
to implement them (code). And on top of that, implement
them for both Jack1 and Jack2.
-gabriel