31 Jan
2007
31 Jan
'07
7:41 a.m.
On 31 Jan 2007, at 11:27, Bob Ham wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 23:30 +0100, torbenh(a)gmx.de
wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily the case, just because Linux had
better RT performance in 2000 doesn't mean it still does today, with
Vista and general improvements.
I think it's reasonable for management to question if it's still the
best choice.
- Steve
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:18:06PM +0000, Bob Ham
wrote:
You are correct there. From the modern business perspective, though,
management are Michael's personal customers.
I think the argument still applies. If your goal is to convince
someone
that your choice of linux is correct, telling them why you chose linux
in the first place seems, to me at least, to be the best method,
rather
than seeking out reasons which you yourself haven't been concerned
with
previously. On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:05 +0000, Bob Ham
wrote:
the customers dont notice. they still use windows or no computers at
all.
it looks rather like a question from the management. On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 09:03 -0800, Michael Ost
wrote:
> Can anyone suggest ways to compare audio/midi performance
> between Linux
> and Windows that ... make Linux compare favorably?
> I work for a company that sells a Linux based piece of hardware
> that
> plays windows VSTs.
The word "FUD" comes to mind. No idea why.
Further to that, something constructive: perhaps you could try
telling
your customers why *you* chose linux, rather than trying to find
reasons
to tell them *they* should.