10 May
2007
10 May
'07
7:43 a.m.
Dave Robillard wrote:
>> arguing for unnecessary inclusions is a waste
of time.
> Indeed it is. I'll argue for removals then. Neither run()
> nor init() need the current parameters as they can be
> provided by extensions.
[...]
run is obviously needed to.... duh, run the plugin. It's in LADSPA,
fons hasn't said anything about removing run();
he just proposed to remove the argument(s) from run(), so no need for
getting extra sarcastic
mfga.dsr
IOhannes