27 Jan
2007
27 Jan
'07
7:37 a.m.
On Saturday 27 January 2007 06:47, Loki Davison wrote:
On 1/27/07, Fraser <fraser(a)arkhostings.com>
wrote:
And why should you code for a plugin standard that nothing supports?
Besides, is LV2 even finished?
Suggesting that LADSPA is deprecated is a bit of a stretch. It may not be
perfect, but it's well supported.
/Robert
Hi All,
I've been converting my old VST plugins over to LADSPA and have come
across something in the api which I really miss - the inability separate
the algorithmic to the displayed value of a parameter.
I'm finding this inability is leading to non-ideal programming habits.
why are you coding new stuff for a depreciated system? Why not LV2? It's extensible so if anything is missing you can
add it.
http://lv2plug.in/
Loki
p.s.
hiking in yunnan / tibet border area is pretty awesome!