22 Oct
2012
22 Oct
'12
5:26 p.m.
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 11:41 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 07:15:32PM -0400, David
Robillard wrote:
Whatever. Congratulations, you are right (and nobody cares).
You have also completely killed any incentive to work on that supposedly
good effort.
-dr
Well, this effort which you have so vehemently
attacked was an effort to
establish this functionality in hosts.
I did not attack that effort (which I see as a good thing), nor LV2
in general.
I did 'attack'
1. Your statement (in your original post) that zero-latency convolution
requires synchronous operation and does not allow the use of threads,
2. Your statement (in a later post) that the multithreaded approach used
by zita-convolver leads to less stable and reliable systems.
Both statements are wrong, that's all there is to it.