23 Jan
2008
23 Jan
'08
9:51 a.m.
On 23 Jan 2008, at 14:35, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:10 +0000, Krzysztof Foltman
wrote:
That's a good idea, obviously - but it can be hard to express those
kinds of restrictions in a machine readable form, even in RDF :)
Also, it will tend to complicate the schema, which is currently quite
simple.
Perhaps it would make a good adjunct file? tv2-restrictions.ttl or
something?
- Steve
Steve Harris wrote:
IMO all the descriptions of restrictions in lv2.ttl that are currently
in comments should be in machine readable form for this reason.
Having
that stuff in comments only is pretty silly, really. To my mind it's better for us to develop a
large suite of tools and
plugins to demonstrate the viability and advantages before we go
I think we indeed need lots of testing tools - like debugging
hosts/plugins spiked with lots of pre/postcondition checks, or even
some
validity checking libraries that could be easily inserted (#ifdef'ed)
into "real" hosts/plugins, to check plugin/host behaviour in "real
world".