Re: [LAD] A small article about tools for electronic musicians

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Ralf Mardorf &lt;ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net <mailto:ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>> wrote: Ralf Mardorf wrote: Louigi Verona wrote: Difficult to explain. let me draw: C5 is a note C5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A 3/16 would create this kind of echo: C5 _ _ c5 _ _ c5 _ On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ralf Mardorf &lt;ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net <mailto:ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> <mailto:ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net <mailto:ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>>> wrote: None of the LADSPA ones I tried just give you a normal 3/16 delay. What exactly do you mean with this? Are you talking about triplets? Just use the calculator to find out how long a triplet is regarding to the BPM and round the result to the available ms. Or is 3 for left to center to right, for semiquavers? Please add your reply under the quote. You're talking about triplets, especially because you do dub music ;). This is possible. 60000/120BPM=500ms for a 1/4 note. E.g. 500ms/3=166.7ms for triplets, reps. 166.7ms/x or 166.7ms*x for other triplets. Resp. you aren't talking about triplets if e.g. one _ is for 1/8 note. Do you wish to have a delay were not all delays do come at a steady note? I am not sure guys what you are talking about. I understand that you can multiply something - this is very clear. You can even forget about plugins and just take the sound and paste it with a lower volume. I cannot always point a finger to what exactly i do not like about delays. CALF vintage delays is nice, but the fact that I can make it pan ping-pong only by setting different time in L and R is not good. And the whole Subdivide control is very confusing. In many simple VSTs you have 1, 2/4, 3/16 kinda settings and it is all tied to a tempo. Echoverse in Rakarrack is very good.