9 Mar
2004
9 Mar
'04
10:45 a.m.
[Steve Harris]
here, have one from my cookiejar. the spec doesn't require port names
to stay consistent throughout successor versions of a plugin. though i
agree it is nice if they do.
it's still
a wart. if you shun the work of changing swh-plugins, i'll
happily offer to patch it to remove the unit references.
The work is not a problem (its a disposable perl script and some tidying),
it just changes something in LADSPA that probably should not be changed.
It might even require new IDs for all the plugins that get new port names.
(though I've changed ports in the past without changing IDs, bad Steve, no
bisciut). I'm not sure that a slightly easier to read and
slightly more efficient
text dipslay format is a worthwhile goal.
i am, as you will have noticed. :)
amicalement,
tim