7 Jan
2005
7 Jan
'05
5:29 p.m.
* Matt Mackall (mpm(a)selenic.com) wrote:
Feh. The RT scheduling class issue is orthogonal.
Addressing mlock and
scheduling class at once (and nothing else) is actually an ugliness of
your LSM approach as there are folks who want mlock and not RT.
Last I checked they could be controlled separately in that module. It
has been suggested (by me and others) that one possible solution would
be to expand it to be generic for all caps.
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net