6 Sep
2007
6 Sep
'07
6:55 a.m.
On 6 Sep 2007, at 09:49, Georg Holzmann wrote:
yep. maybe the gstreamer way is a possible solutions,
or something
similar. they have three categories: good, bad and ugly (which are
also different packages):
-------8<--------
gst-plugins-good: a set of good-quality plug-ins under our
preferred license, LGPL
gst-plugins-ugly: a set of good-quality plug-ins that might pose
distribution problems
gst-plugins-bad: a set of plug-ins that need more quality
--------8<--------
(http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/modules/)
So I think a common SVN/CVS repository for LADSPA plugins would be
nice, if all authors would agree on that and would manage their
code within that.
1) er, no
2) what would that help?
LV2 has been designed to make it possible to have cross platform,
binary plugin downloads, but in LADSPA you're really dependent on the
platforms package mechanism, be it DMGs, RPMs or DEBs.
- Steve