17 Apr
2011
17 Apr
'11
6:16 p.m.
On 17 April 2011 18:12, David Robillard <d(a)drobilla.net> wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:59 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
Library name plus label, for example. My hosts do that and have done
for years. Not ideal either of course, but at least it doesn't
completely stuff up any situation where a numerical ID can't be
generated in advance (dssi-vst, etc).
Chris
I like to disagree with David on most things
LADSPA -- for example I
think a host that uses the "unique" ID at all is broken from the
outset
Well, that's just silly... it's the only ID there is. What else would
they use?