18 Aug
2003
18 Aug
'03
8:44 p.m.
måndag 18 augusti 2003 23:26 skrev nikodimka:
I can't remember the beginning of this thread, though gut feeling is that
there are already quite a few projects in this vein.
If you truly want to do rapid synth development you should construct synths in
Pd or Max, or even one of the modular synths, e.g. galan, ssm, ams + probably
several others, Supercollider comes to mind since it was recently mentioned
here.
But, if you don't find what you "need" in the current flora of projects, you
are welcome to try, it's your own free time :)
/Robert
Heh :) two different answers :)
:)
Well, I guess they are the same but from two different angles.
MusE's softsynths could be discribed as the wrapper Steve mentions.
>
> They can, the softsynths that are internal to MusE work that way.
>
..
No, each LADSPA plugin could only be one voice, youd have to write a
wrapper to hand voice allocation and MIDI handling.
- Steve
So what do you guys think?
Does LAD community need an SDK for rapid development of
out of process, aseq-to-jack, (plus ladcca ?) synths?
Or are there some reasons why this idea is inpractical?