17 Aug
2004
17 Aug
'04
7:40 p.m.
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:00 pm, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 12:53, Ralf Beck wrote:
Clarifying. I thought it was cool you like the concept
Am Dienstag, 17. August 2004 01:47 schrieb Lee
Revell:
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 19:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, John Check wrote:
> > That was exactly what I was thinking when the penny dropped for me.
> > Originally I was thinking of offload the softsynths, but FX are
> > expensive too. The ideal is to make a total system, but make it
> > modular, and give it the ability to connect with existing
> > commercial systems via a VST counterpart to the plugin.
> > We need to take over incrementally and this is a killer strategy to
> > get a toehold.
In the comercial windows world, FX-Teleport and VST System Link are doing
exactly this.
I think jack over ethernet could be as easy as writing a pseudo alsa
driver that emulates a soundcard but sends/receives UDP packets over
ethernet. I'm not that familiar with jack internals, but
writing a new jack driver
(like the firewire one, and oss one) would be a much, much better idea
than writing some alsa-over-network monstrosity for too many reasons to
list.
Err.. yeah I'd have to agree.
-DR-