12 May
2005
12 May
'05
8:53 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 17:50 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
Why do you say it's only a possibility? AFAIK the high res timer patch
works fine on most hardware...
Lee
i'm trying
to sleep for some very low time slices ... about 100 to 1000
us ...
but i can't get below about 1 ms ... are there any workarounds to sleep
for very small time slices?
i tested nanosleep(), usleep() and select(0, 0, 0, 0, &timout) ...
on a normal kernel, there's no way around this. the only possibility
is with a kernel running the hi-res timer patch. even then, its only a
possibility.