31 Dec
2005
31 Dec
'05
11:10 a.m.
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 14:58 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
Paul Davis:
i guess it all depends on one's definition of "sufficient". my take is
that there are several MIDI h/w boxes that guarantee MIDI delivery to a
resolution that matches the wire protocol (1/3msec). until we have
scheduling capabilities that match this (or better), i don't feel
comfortable calling them "sufficient".
most of the ALSA sequencer's
capabilities are redundant, which is compounded
because it currently has
no way of providing sufficiently accurate scheduling
You say this as if it were self-evident, when it's been
the subject of much of this thread. _Does_ it have
no way of providing sufficiently accurate scheduling?
If not, why not?