8 Aug
2009
8 Aug
'09
6:58 p.m.
On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:30:26 Raymond Martin wrote:
On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:19:09 drew Roberts
wrote:
I find we (people) often miss key points unless they are specifically pointed
out. Just trying to do my bit to see that we are actually understanding one
another so we can see what real disagreements remain. I find we (people
again) often think they disagree on more than they actually do due to
misunderstandings. Or they agree on some things they think they disagree on
and disagree on some things they think they agree on.
On Saturday 08 August 2009 12:34:26 Thomas
Vecchione wrote:
I thought that was obvious from my comments and the law text itself. No? he standard is "likelihood of
confusion." To be more specific, the use
of a trademark in connection with the sale of a good constitutes
infringement if it is likely to cause consumer confusion as to the
source of those goods or as to the sponsorship or approval of such
goods.
I think Raymond may be keying on the "sale of a good" phrase and
indicating that at least with some Free Software, no good is for *sale*.
Raymond
all the best,
drew