19 Aug
2003
19 Aug
'03
6:20 a.m.
Hallo,
nikodimka hat gesagt: // nikodimka wrote:
I don't quite see why you want or what you mean with "a single
executable". For example Pd is a single executable. It only loads and
runs the objects one uses in a certain patch. If the small Tk GUI of
Pd really is too much for a machine then it is possible to run without
it.
For a compiled language SFront might be used, where in the end the
synth description is actually compiled with a C compiler into a synth.
ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
Well, why not
extend some of the existing softsynths? That's what I
do: Because I'm too lazy to write gui code I write Pd externals. The
GUI part can be quickly done inside Pd (and every other user could do
their own). jMax or SSM also come to mind
Its only a half of solution.
Can I "compile" or "render" the resulting engine into single
executable?
I feel pretty uncomfortable when instead of using a small
self-contained synth I have to load its guts into editing
environment.