22 Apr
2006
22 Apr
'06
8:19 a.m.
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 10:53 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Almost two years ago at the LA conference a bunch of
us agreed that
something need to be done to improve LADSPA, and on the approximate
direction it should take.
Anyway, I finally got round to making a sketch plugin and .h file:
http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/
Nice. The header and the plugin code really looks a lot cleaner without
all the metadata embedded in it.
The data is in the amp.ttl file (it's in Turtle
http://www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle/ an easy to hand-write RDF syntax).
We could mandate a particular syntax for the spec.
It looks a lot nicer than the XML syntax.
Overall I think this is a much better approach than
LADSPA 1.x, it has
usable identifiers, a clear route for extensions without compatibility
problems and each plugin is quite a lot simpler.
What type of extensions are you talking about here, and what is the
clear route?
--
Lars Luthman
PGP key: http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E