15 Dec
2010
15 Dec
'10
4:02 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 05:14 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On Wednesday, December 15, 2010 05:01:58 am Tim E.
Real did opine:
Hi Gene :)
*chuckle* I wrote Tim off-list, because I thought it became OT for the
OT thread. This reminds me, that I need to reply to some mails off-list
to you too, sorry, I've got issues with antihypertensive drugs and less
time at the moment and by the way, the side effects did effect my
psyche, anyway, I didn't notice to be paranoid ;D, perhaps this will
change, when reading more posts for this thread.
Is it proved that there is a back door for versions ex 2.6.2a?
Cheers!
Ralf
On December 14, 2010 10:04:10 pm Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
Ralf I suspect, if he were to use pgp, would be like me, and only trust
pgp-2.6.2a, the last one before they put Zimmerman in jail for a few years.
I have often said, and have been called the uber paranoid for it, that one
of the conditions of his release was that the next generation of pgp had a
back door. Denials out the yang are always instantaneous, but none of them
came from Pete, so I have no choice but to conclude he is under NDA as the
price of his freedom. So I figure the lack of compatibility of modern
versions means I might as well use plain text anyway. My views aren't
secret anyway if you read my sig. On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 02:47 +0000, Harry Van
Haaren wrote:
Ha. Good one.
But really, should we all be using some form of it?
I did for a while. I notice some folks here use it, some don't.
KMail always says unknown (I think we have to share keys).
Would it be better for LAD? Does it matter?
Will it, soon, the way things are going?
Big brother is the corporations.
I used to be able to claim a prize in a bag of potato chips by walking
in to any store and handing over a ticket. Now I must 'register'
on-line.
This technology we use is a delicate dance between convenience and
security, but I don't like what I'm seeing transpire these days...
Here, our gov created a national "do not call" list, which we could join
and telemarketers would not be allowed to call us, if we said so.
People flocked to the list!
Then the gov sold the list to some marketing group. Ugh...
Tim. On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
A lot of people do, but perhaps they do it for mails that
anyway are in
public, e.g. to correspond to mailing lists.
Anybody know of a public email provider that is better? Or more so:
that can prove they are better?
Open to suggestions :-)
-Harry
An evasive answer: For a while I used OpenPGP for emails ;). Perhaps
all autistics and savants able to do prime factorization are only
working for Google and no other provider or even intelligence
services :D.