4 May
2004
4 May
'04
3:44 p.m.
On tis, 2004-05-04 at 15:45, Takashi Iwai wrote:
2) the firmware data is, so far, provided also under
GPL, too.
(i.e. it is redistributable by any person.)
and this looks like a problem. if the firmware data is regarded as
a "program", the corresponding source codes must be provided.
but if it's nothing but "data"? how can we prove for/against that?
Ahh! (insert lightbulb ...)
So if the firmware was just plainly distributed as
"(C) foo.com / bar.org", then the problem would go away?
/jens