26 Jul
2006
26 Jul
'06
8:25 a.m.
On Wednesday 26 Jul 2006 11:12, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
I think if your class is named LikeThis, then your method should be named
likeThat (Java-style). If your method is named like_this, then your class
should be named like_that (STL-style). Either is fine, but don't mix your
dialects.
Mmm. For what it's worth, I write mostly C++ but have no problem with using
the libsndfile C API. I don't really mind whether it has a C++ API as well
or not. So yes, you probably should ignore me.
Chris
Well, it is very thin though. Which is not a bad thing
at all. One could
make ue of an arbitrary amount of more advanced C++ features if desired
though (i.e. templates parametrized with the type you want to read for
example, or operator<< and operator>> for reading and writing, etc.)
operator<< and >>... ugh.
Secondly, with
regard to the method names, which do you prefer:
- OpenRead
- openRead
- open_read
vote++, i never cared for the more java style methodName convention. Since
you're the only person who actually responded to the real
meat of my email, I have to assume that you are the only person
on this list with a love for C++ and hence the only one who
should have any real input on this issue ;-).
Nicely worded :)