7 Jan
2014
7 Jan
'14
5:03 p.m.
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 00:22 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Dominique
Michel wrote:
Since it seems to continue on the list.
I agree with Fons statement, but IMO it's likely that in the future
physics will change a lot assumed humans will survive another 2000 years
or longer.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: Dominique Michel
Subject: [off-list][LAD] Audio Levitation
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:59:36 +0100
Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 00:32 +0100, Dominique Michel wrote:
... mainstream physics doesn't validate
Evans' theory (as it
didn't validated Galileo's theory at his time)
That is one of the most intellectually dishonest analogies I've
seen so far. Galileo's theories were not rejected by fellow
scientist - those who repeated his observations tended to agree.
He was silenced because he undermined the teachings of the
Catholic Church.
No such thing happened to Evans. His theories were discredited
because his argumentation contained mathematical errors. These
have been published and can be verified by everyone who cares. I just say it is other theories today than the one
we learn at school
That's true and it even might be that "the law of conservation of
energy" someday will be outdated. Nowadays it's just that most, if not
all super-ideas are simply nonsense.