26 Jun
2006
26 Jun
'06
12:51 p.m.
Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 10:11 +0200, Pieter Palmers
wrote:
I'm sorry for my previous response... a
monday-morning-bad-temper-leave-me-alone one that was very
non-constructive. On top of that it is quite stupid to ask for help and
at the same time claim "you'll have to take my word on it".
Please accept my apologies.
Lee Revell wrote:
Take damn a digital photo. I'm sorry for being a jerk, but I'm not going
to debug an oops blind :P On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 01:08 +0200, Pieter Palmers
wrote:
no :p. I'm sorry for being a jerk, but I'm not going to type over that
message just so that you can confirm that it indeed is a 'soft lockup'
(or whatever it is called exactly) and that it occurs in the
ohci1394_iso_unregister_tasklet. You'll have to take my word on it. If
you need some specific part of the kernel message, you can get it. Tell
me what you wqant and why, that way I can learn something from it. Hi,
We are experiencing 'soft' deadlocks when running our code (Freebob,
i.e. userspace lib for firewire audio) on RT kernels. After a few
seconds, I get a kernel panic message that signals a soft lockup.
Can we see the kernel panic message? ;-)
Seriously, if you are going to ask for help, be prepared to provide the
info requested, or plan on getting little to no help.
Of course. My monday-morning bad temper is over by now, and I hope I
didn't transfer it to any of you. I'll provide the panic, one way or
another.
Again, I apologize,
Pieter