Ralf Mardorf wrote:
There is a reason. A scumbag company forced
trademark issues to the
front
even though they were doing FOSS. Trademarks in FOSS are just as bad as
software patents. Too bad most people do not get that.
Okay, maybe for names and logos used by FLOSS, the creative commons
should be forced as an agreement or something similar to this.
I guess it should be possible to make out which project is which
project. I would be fine with "Impr-visor" and "Improvisor" or what
ever
names Bob and you are using, but I don't hink it's perfect with those
names. They are "very" similar forks, so "very" similar, but different
names IMO are an good idea.
IMO the same name would be bad, and completely different names would be
bad too. Anyway, I would like to have less confusable naming, that
however will highlight the relationship.
Now:
I guess I really should shut up.