9 Dec
2007
9 Dec
'07
11:28 p.m.
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 23:20 +0100, Lars Luthman wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 11:58 -0500, Dave Robillard
wrote:
Ah, that was it. Back to char we go.
I was thinking maybe having it be char* would be convenient for events
where the actual data is in some pool somewhere (ie being able to reuse
this struct in that case would be handy), but I guess that could just be
another event type?
char* does cause confusion though, as this thread made painfully clear
earlier...
-DR-
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 11:52 -0500, Dave Robillard
wrote:
Not valid in C++. On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 15:06 +0000, Krzysztof
Foltman wrote:
n/m, char data[] is C99. Guess that works. Dave Robillard wrote:
> Is this what we have for the event/buffer header, then?
> http://svn.drobilla.net/lad/lv2/extensions/events/lv2_events.h
>
char data? why not char data[0]?
Not standard C AFAIK.