31 Aug
2004
31 Aug
'04
9:50 a.m.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:30:41 -0600
martin rumori <lists(a)rumori.de> wrote:
but, with 1.0.10 and 1.0.11pre4,
SF_INFO info;
info.format = SF_FORMAT_AIFF | SF_FORMAT_PCM_16 | SF_ENDIAN_LITTLE;
if (! sf_format_check(&info))
{
printf("AIFF | LITTLE invalid\n");
}
info.format = SF_FORMAT_AIFF | SF_FORMAT_PCM_16 | SF_ENDIAN_BIG;
if (! sf_format_check(&info))
{
printf("AIFF | BIG invalid\n");
}
yields me both an error. is that supposed to return true?
For sf_format_check() to return TRUE, you MUST also set the sample
rate, channel count and number of channels.
<snip>
i don't know too much about the data organisation
in .aiff and .wav,
but if the comment is located in the head of the file, it could still
be possible to write/change the data section in SFM_RDWR.
Yes, and that should be possible. What is not possible is
openning the file RDWR and modifying the string data in the
header.
what do you
think about letting sf_set_string() fail in any other mode than
SFM_WRITE,
Yes, thats sound pretty sensible.
but still allowing to open files with comments in
SF_RDWR
and to use the sf_writex_*() calls? (currently possible with AIFF,
but not with WAV).
Are you sure?
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo nospam(a)mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Linux is produced to be used, whereas the others are produced
to be sold" -- Bobby D. Bryant