12 Jul
2006
12 Jul
'06
7:46 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 17:06 -0400, Dave Robillard
wrote:
IMHO they are still slow, especially when you port software to OSX then
pthreads and semaphores are *very* slow (well, it depends how much and
where you use them of course).
my solution so far is assuming that boolean is atomical.
all multi threaded handling i wrote is based on this assumption: i use
it in pipe and linklist classes, but semaphores could also be there.
i found no probems and good speed so far
... and life is boring without risks :))
ciao
- --
jaromil, dyne.org rasta coder, http://rastasoft.org
Semaphores seem about perfect for this to me.. am
I missing something?
Why doesn't anyone ever recommend them?
i think mostly because in 2000-2001, they were very slow. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEtW0Je2QxhLU0C14RAgoFAJ46wjWQ1TQcuisiWAGlNUe/r+4q0wCeKbhc
1LwvuKrz6u5FrljSDS6J4F0=
=RTwn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----