8 Jun
2010
8 Jun
'10
10:03 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Robin Gareus <robin(a)gareus.org> wrote:
On 06/08/2010 09:07 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
"better" in that I have seen complaints from people here before about
getting duplicate copies from reply-to-all. Using reply-to-list
presumably avoids that.
I wouldn't really know, I don't have reply-to-list either and don't
greatly care. Thought it might cut down some potential objections
though.
Chris
So: reply-to-list is better if you have it, but
if you don't, use reply-to-all.
mmh "better" in what way?