16 Dec
2008
16 Dec
'08
2:52 p.m.
oc2pus(a)arcor.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 schrieb
torbenh(a)gmx.de:
THAT'S the evilness? You don't know what time it is! Yes, a Suse install
comes with default packages @ repo-oss. Is Packman incompatible to Suse
repositories? Ican't read anything in the Linux Club howtos, stupid
people like me should read.
YOU ARE WRONG and tries to blame me, even if I came with the calumet and
was sorry that I boiled over.
NOW YOU are again twisting the truth. YOU LOSER!
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:31:22PM +0100,
oc2pus(a)arcor.de wrote:
just for the records:
these are not packman packages.
the packman packages contains a X.pm.Y in the release tag, the actual version
is 0.116.1.
Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 schrieb Thomas
Kuther:
hmm... ok. it looks like libjack0-0.109.2 is not requiring
jack-0.109.2.
and jack-0.109.2 only requires libjack0.so
which can be provided by libjack2 and libjack1.
i consider this broken.
@ oc2pus, jack in packman is broken, or YaST is.
I set up a fresh
install in a virtual machine using 11.1RC1 and only added packman.
Currently there is:
* pulseaudio-module-jack-0.9.12-8.5
* libjack0-0.116.1-0.pm.1
Now if I tick the box in YaST to install "jack" it pulls in
libjackserver2-0 and jack, which of course breaks things, as it keeps
libjack0. zypper on the other side gets it right. See the screenshot!
http://gimpel.ath.cx/~tom/jack_weirdness.png
nor the packman package or yast is broken...
A lib-package normally doesn't contain a
requirement to a program-package.
For my packages in the packman repository:
As a reaction of this thread, I uploaded new packages for jack and jack2.
They are now mutually exclusive and the user must change wich one to use.
Formerly jack2 was handled as a update to jack.I followed also the idea from
Torben to handle the jack-daemon like a library.
The "Requires" to the underlying library packages where already part of the
packman packages. So I hope the problems of upgrading/changing the
jack-versions are solved.
And a last note to Mr. Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
your posting in the linux-club community is very astonishing. You grab
sentences from Paul and others from here and put them in a very very special
context to fit your argumentation against SuSE distribution and especially
the packman repository.
http://www.linux-club.de/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=99521&p=605724#p605724
And words like "überhebliche Schwätzer" are very motivating.
have fun
oc2pus
No I'm Pro-Suse, I was going to write an howto and you always quoted me
wrong, BECAUSE I mentioned that if you have knowledge about pro-audio
and you are really making music, you need to have different kernels than
those from the packages, you need to compile stuff yourself, because you
always will get troubles and the moderators made jokes about me, even
you MOTHERFUCKER made jokes here.
You said IN THIS LIST, NOBODY will have any conflicts, it's only me.
You twisting the truth even now, I would like to make Suse a audio and
MIDI workstation, that's why I do what I do.
IGNORANT PEOPLE like you make it impossible, you are AGAINST SUSE, it's
not me.
YOU ARE A LIAR and everybody can read it here.