16 Jan
2003
16 Jan
'03
10:05 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:38:53PM +0200, janne halttunen wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 +0000
Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
No, I dont think so. An audio rate control is just one that has a value
per sample, instead of a value per block. Its usful for things like FM
frequency which can be changed very quickly. Hey, I just thought of a use
for it ;)
- Steve
AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control
should/could be controlled
by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to
the next audio signal by default. I can't think of any simple examples off
hand, but combined with MOMENTARY it could be used for sample accurate
tempo tapping.
My comments: I really like MOMENTARY and RANDOMISABLE. AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL
could be useful, but might be painful for hosts to implement. I dont have
any particular use for it right now.
Not to mention that AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL would completely useless in JACK?
You'd have a buffer-full of samples and apply frequency shift to them,
which would change the length of that buffer, which you couldn't give to
JACK unless you do some rebuffering.