10 Apr
2004
10 Apr
'04
4:01 p.m.
Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 19:42, Simon Jenkins wrote:
It might be what you meant... but it flatly contradicts what you *said*.
will(a)malefactor.org wrote:
That's what i meant by describing the extent to which the 'general
public' rule applies.
IANAL, but I'm 99% sure that when you give
someone a GPLd executable,
you're only obligated to provide that one person with the sources, not the
"general public" (read: everyone on earth).
True. Just that one person.
IAAL, although i'm not saying i'm a good one
;)
Do you defend "difficult cases" by any chance? Cos you're pretty good
at
obfuscation, thats for sure. If ever I'm accused of something I'm guilty of
(erm... again...) I want you on my team! :)
Simon Jenkins