25 Nov
2011
25 Nov
'11
12:42 a.m.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 03:12:12PM -0800, Jeff Koftinoff wrote:
On 2011-11-24, at 12:45 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
More generally, the model shouldn't make assumptions about the
view. In this case, the fact that the fader 'ends' at -100 dB,
and that consequently this value should be taken to mean 'off',
is an implementation detail of the view. The model should allow
gains below -100 dB (up to some reasonable value).
Anyway, for me it's time to go to sleep. And seeing your TZ
and knowing the date I suspect a turkey is waiting for you :-)
Ciao,
--
FA
Vor uns liegt ein weites Tal, die Sonne scheint - ein Glitzerstrahl.
Not always. Consider the case of 'VCA'
groups for faders. That
is: you have a slider that controls the gain of a group of
channels (without those being mixed). The effective channel
gain (in dB) is the sum of the per channel fader value and
the one from the group fader. The model sees only this sum.
This is the mistake. In Model View Controller, your VCA group
fader would have an associated value in the model. The view edits
this. The controller calculates the resultant effective channel gains.