On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:09:02 +0100
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Dave
Robillard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:15 +0100, Fons
Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben
Stien wrote:
But that's really the funny thing here. Your
software isn't
from the free/open source software communities. It doesn't
conform to neither the free software definition nor the open
source definition.
I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that
the software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further
restrictions on the work, if I read the license correctly.
Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards
rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's
Republic of China, mid 1960s) ?
Because you're trolling? :)
No, it reminds me because of the wording. I guess I've grown to
be allergic to any statements of the form
"You are not a true Communist/Christian/Moslim/American/..."
as if the writer, waving some canonical document or little book,
would be able to judge about that.
It's part of the typical "us and them" way of thinking, which is
usually a source of misery only.
Ciao,
FYI, I talked to Justin and tried to get him over here, but he won't
join the discussion.
In his opinion there's too much zealotism here and thus he sees it as a
waste of time. Also, regarding the initial quote he said that it was an
opinion rather than a statement of fact.
I would have liked to see a discussion, whatever the outcome may have
been.
Looks like it's not gonna happen.
Best Regards
Philipp