8 Dec
2002
8 Dec
'02
6:50 a.m.
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:02:07 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
Me too, not a very good name.
Your more immediate problem is making it easy for a LADSPA host to host
[insert name here] plugins. There are a lot of LADSPA hosts, and zero
[...] hosts.
- Steve
Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so
complicated that an
instrument API must not support it?
Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
that LADSPA will still be simpler.