Dear Fons,
Please accept an apology from me regarding my slant on your integrity.
When you explained the difference between your wording, of designing
a filter for AMS, not designing the filter of AMS, I realised my mistake in
what was quite a defamatory and insulting email to you. Even considering
the possible ambiguity of your statement, my response was disrespectful,
in error, and I apologise for both.
I will post this to also to the list, even though it was not where I proposed
we held the discussion. At least that way at least that way my accusation
and acknowledgement of fault both appear here which seems reasonable.
Kindest Regards, nick.
From: compose59(a)gmail.com
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:00:28 +0300
To: fons(a)kokkinizita.net
CC: linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Subject: Re: [LAD] For your information
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:23 AM, <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:02:27AM +0100, torbenh
wrote:
Reading this old stuff again, it seems the
plugins use
Fs/16 as the effective control rate - I had completely
forgotten about that :-)
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Aah, the immortality of good ideas.
:)
--
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe(a)openoctave.org
development-subscribe(a)openoctave.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969