11 Dec
2002
11 Dec
'02
5:26 p.m.
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 21.50, Steve Harris wrote:
Agreed.
Well, I suggested scale converters in the first place, so I shouldn't
be complaining. ;-)
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
.- M A I A -------------------------------------------------.
| The Multimedia Application Integration Architecture |
`----------------------------> http://www.linuxdj.com/maia -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:49:17 +0000, Nathaniel
Virgo wrote:
Only found "Post to mailing list"... :-/
Sorry, I just tend to hit "reply to
all" because some lists seem
to be set up so that "reply" doesn't go to the list.
See if your mail client has a reply-to-list deature, mutt does
(<shift>+L). I like the idea of enforced "explicit
casting", but I think
it's rather restrictive not to allow synths to take note_pitch.
That would make it impossible to have synths with integrated
event processors (including scale converters; although *that*
might actually be a good idea)
That would be bad. If a synth takes note_pitch it's bound to
interpret it as 12tET, which would be annoying to someone trying
to use a different scale. A synth could still have a built in
event processor, but it should only process linear_pitch events.
Scale converters should definately not be built into synths.