24 May
2010
24 May
'10
4:04 a.m.
On 05/23/10 17:14, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 05/23/2010 10:22 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
[...]
You can assume quite a bit, if you are willing to assume something that
could be wrong. ;)
If that doesn't work as expected, then whoever over-rode operator+ and
operator= probably need some form of abuse.
... by which I don't mean to imply that I
can't understand it
(although, with C++, there is always the possibility that I _think_ I
can understand it but am sadly mistaken because of some weird shit
happening behind the scenes). I just mean that I can't simply read
it.
I once read a great (and funny) article arguing that you simple can't assume
anything about what the following means in C++:
a = b + c
Nothing