Re: [LAD] Looping audio to oneself via Jack

On 05/04/2011 02:48 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote: ... > The only real bug is that this doesn't work correctly with > the optimisation for a single output connected to an input. exactly. if you connect any other thing to that same input port the "zero-copy" issue goes away :) side-note to who might concern: it has been previously reported as a qtractor bug though, when doing this kind of direct loopback in a brainless bouncing scenario. fact is, it's one half of the problem (jack zero-copy optimization)--the other half gets to which track bounces to which first (ie. depends on process/track order) and that's definitively a qtractor's under-the-hood issue but not one i call urgent atm. besides, jack's "zero-copy" issue remains still, attotw alas, i am not that convinced it is a jack bug. if one, say a jack client, ever wants to allow a direct loopback, why doesn't he/she do the appropriate code him/her-self? it's a lousy memcpy() away isn't it? byee -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc(a)rncbc.org