Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 schrieb torbenh(a)gmx.de:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:31:22PM +0100,
oc2pus(a)arcor.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 schrieb Thomas
Kuther:
@ oc2pus, jack in packman is broken, or YaST is.
I set up a fresh
install in a virtual machine using 11.1RC1 and only added packman.
Currently there is:
* pulseaudio-module-jack-0.9.12-8.5
* libjack0-0.116.1-0.pm.1
Now if I tick the box in YaST to install "jack" it pulls in
libjackserver2-0 and jack, which of course breaks things, as it keeps
libjack0. zypper on the other side gets it right. See the screenshot!
http://gimpel.ath.cx/~tom/jack_weirdness.png
nor the packman package or yast is broken...
hmm... ok. it looks like libjack0-0.109.2 is not requiring
jack-0.109.2.
and jack-0.109.2 only requires libjack0.so
which can be provided by libjack2 and libjack1.
i consider this broken.
just for the records:
these are not packman packages.
the packman packages contains a X.pm.Y in the release tag, the actual version
is 0.116.1.
A lib-package normally doesn't contain a requirement to a program-package.
For my packages in the packman repository:
As a reaction of this thread, I uploaded new packages for jack and jack2.
They are now mutually exclusive and the user must change wich one to use.
Formerly jack2 was handled as a update to jack.I followed also the idea from
Torben to handle the jack-daemon like a library.
The "Requires" to the underlying library packages where already part of the
packman packages. So I hope the problems of upgrading/changing the
jack-versions are solved.
And a last note to Mr. Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
your posting in the linux-club community is very astonishing. You grab
sentences from Paul and others from here and put them in a very very special
context to fit your argumentation against SuSE distribution and especially
the packman repository.
http://www.linux-club.de/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=99521&p=605724#p605724
And words like "überhebliche Schwätzer" are very motivating.
have fun
oc2pus