26 Jan
2010
26 Jan
'10
11:38 a.m.
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Chris Cannam <cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com> wrote:
From: Chris Cannam
<cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com>
Subject: Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1
To: "torbenh" <torbenh(a)gmx.de>
Cc: linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 7:38 AM
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM,
torbenh <torbenh(a)gmx.de>
wrote:
and would I assume correctly that one of the reasons to not let the jack1 codebase
"die" (or freeze) is that it is written in C as opposed to jack2 ?
J.
since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a
feature freeze,
i added some features.
- smp aware
- clickless connections
Is there any reason why a user would prefer this over
jack2?